jfweemaes / ubiquity-xforms

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/ubiquity-xforms
0 stars 0 forks source link

Change Ubiquity for use with Dojo #615

Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
I created this issue to convey some of my ideas and decisions on how to 
implement this as well as a reminder of some of the tasks that need to be 
completed for this to be successful and follow the YUI process.

1. YUI loader and Dojo XDomain loader differ in a couple different spots. 
First Dojo.require can be used to load dojo files outside the core and to 
load custom javascript.

2. There is no error condition returned by a file not loaded unless a 
timeout is set. We must set the DjConfig = true & DjConfig.xdWaitSeconds. 
So therefore the loader-begin must be changed.

3. The xforms-loader.js needs to be changed to Dojo.requires after the 
initial loading files have been loaded.

4. Built vs Un-built version might be worth discussing the performance 
concerns since it differs slightly from the process outline in YUI.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by erik...@gmail.com on 7 Dec 2009 at 9:12

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
I know Mark has been doing some kind-of-related work over in his backplane 
library, 
which includes UXF. There, I understand he has started to use a library called 
Sprockets [1] to handle the management of module dependencies and intends on 
folding 
his work back into UXF somewhere down the line. This would have an obvious 
impact on 
the loader stuff described in this issue.

I've cc'd Mark in case he wants to comment and has not seen this issue yet.

[1] http://getsprockets.org/

Original comment by phil.boo...@gtempaccount.com on 10 Dec 2009 at 11:31

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
Yeah, I should have closed this issue. I was being the keen Co-op student a bit 
on this 
one. John sent me a note saying that Mark had started on something substantial 
related 
to this which is fine. I removed the branch I has created for this so I'll 
close this 
issue.

Original comment by erik...@gmail.com on 10 Dec 2009 at 4:41