jgerity / uspas2016_project3

0 stars 0 forks source link

Machine lattice and magnets #4

Open jgerity opened 8 years ago

jgerity commented 8 years ago

Edits to this section should be in paper_src/lattice_and_magnets.md, discussion belongs here.

Tasks

Ossssip commented 8 years ago

BTW, why don't we adjust the bending magnets strength to keep the electrons on the same orbit with the decrease of their energy? Then we should not have the number-of-turns limit, but the emission spectra would be shifted over time.

jgerity commented 8 years ago

That's an idea that hadn't occurred to me! It's probably not something that could be done turn-by-turn because of the fast rep rate, but for the 1 GeV designs the energy loss per turn is small enough that perhaps our adjustments to the dipole strength could be sensitive on the order of 100 turns (~ μs), and the shift required would be ~3% over this same time...

Unfortunately, now that I'm considering the specific numerics for the 1 T case, that would give a ramp rate of 0.03 [T] / 1 [μs] = 30000 T/s, which is far too large to be technologically realizable, I think. For contrast, with the JLEIC design (where ramp rate is also a concern because of multiple cycles of the booster stage) we have been discussing ramp rates of 1 T/s being pretty demanding. Granted, those are more iron-dominated magnets than what might be used for this compact ring, but I still think it's too many orders of magnitude all the same.

A good source for ramp-rate sensitivity in dipoles can be found in this SSC design document.