Closed matklad closed 6 months ago
I guess we can as well just manually list all the types here?
reverted typescript update, explicit listing seems more readable for consumer.
@jgm could you take a look here? I am trying to use djot in a new context, and inability to name ast types makes writing overrides somewhat painful.
Right now, AST types aren't actually accessible to consumers of djot, as they aren't re-exported from the
ast.ts
file, and only index is visible downstream.I had to update typescript as
export type *
seems to be a fairly new thing.