It's not obvious that djot is, in fact, an extensible format. People are looking for macros, or syntax extension, not find them, and think that it's basically markdown situation.
I think a nice way to improve this would be to have a "Syntax Extensions" section in the docs, which basically says that djot doesn't really need those.
It's not obvious that djot is, in fact, an extensible format. People are looking for macros, or syntax extension, not find them, and think that it's basically markdown situation.
I think a nice way to improve this would be to have a "Syntax Extensions" section in the docs, which basically says that djot doesn't really need those.