As far as I understand, each (most?) block elements are recognized by their first token. If there is no recognition, we default to a para block element.
Is there a way to explicitly start a para block element? Consider the case I want to start a para with a dash.
This appears to work
- first item
- second item
\- no third item, but the start of a para that starts with a dash
So far, so good. Now, I want to start a para with a number and a dot:
1. first item in a numbered list
\2. this is no part of the numbered list as I escaped the 2 character
Again, \2. is not considered part of the numbered list (as intended), however, the backslash has become part of the para element (which was not the case in the correctly rendered bullet list).
Is this a (minor) bug, or did I miss the information on how to escape block element recognition?
As far as I understand, each (most?) block elements are recognized by their first token. If there is no recognition, we default to a
para
block element.Is there a way to explicitly start a para block element? Consider the case I want to start a
para
with a dash.This appears to work
So far, so good. Now, I want to start a para with a number and a dot:
this is a link to both (further simplified) examples
Again,
\2.
is not considered part of the numbered list (as intended), however, the backslash has become part of thepara
element (which was not the case in the correctly rendered bullet list).Is this a (minor) bug, or did I miss the information on how to escape block element recognition?
Cheers, keep up the good work!