Using [_foobar_] instead of {_foobar_} would be more consistent with the other uses of {...} referring to non-text content (attributes), and with content inside [...] denoting the textual part of elements (chiefly, [links]()).
Prior art: This []-based syntax has already been tested in the wild with Textile (e.g. see docs for bold/strong), and I'm not aware of issues found by Textile authors derived from that choice of characters.
Using
[_foobar_]
instead of{_foobar_}
would be more consistent with the other uses of{...}
referring to non-text content (attributes), and with content inside[...]
denoting the textual part of elements (chiefly,[links]()
).Prior art: This
[]
-based syntax has already been tested in the wild with Textile (e.g. see docs for bold/strong), and I'm not aware of issues found by Textile authors derived from that choice of characters.