Right now, a bare Git repo will work fine for a read-only wiki, but writing will go through Data.FileStore.Git.gitSave. At best this doesn't work ("UnknownError: Could not git add 'foo' fatal: this operation must be run in a work tree "), but if a file conflicted with the name of a file in a bare repo, it would simply be overridden.
A bare repo is more convenient if some users will be git pushing to the repo rather than using the web UI, so it'd be nice to see them supported. If you have a suggested technical approach (e.g. make filestore use libgit2 instead of shelling out to Git), I might be able to put some time towards this.
Right now, a bare Git repo will work fine for a read-only wiki, but writing will go through
Data.FileStore.Git.gitSave
. At best this doesn't work ("UnknownError: Could not git add 'foo' fatal: this operation must be run in a work tree "
), but if a file conflicted with the name of a file in a bare repo, it would simply be overridden.A bare repo is more convenient if some users will be
git push
ing to the repo rather than using the web UI, so it'd be nice to see them supported. If you have a suggested technical approach (e.g. make filestore use libgit2 instead of shelling out to Git), I might be able to put some time towards this.