Open adql opened 6 years ago
Of course, in every citation p.
, pp.
, chap.
etc. may be used. This is however inconsistent with a usage scheme in which the user chooses to omit these and rely on BibLaTeX mechanisms for adding the locator for whatever reason (BibLaTeX allows its customization on a per-entry basis).
The \pno
should be added only when --biblatex
output has been specified, and only when the citation suffix starts with a numeral.
https://github.com/jgm/pandoc/pull/7220 might actually provide a solution for this issue. It works in line with pandoc-citeproc's citation locator braces, which were previously stripped. It converts:
[@something, {pages}, additional content]
into
\autocite[\pnfmt{pages}, additional content]{something}
I believe that this solution might be more robust (and a little less magical) than auto-detecting where to insert \pno
(or \ppno
?)
When citing a resource with a comment following the page number, e.g.
[@Jones_2010, 20, my emphasis]
, the resulting LaTeX export is\autocite[20, my emphasis]{Jones_2010}
. This causes BibLaTeX to treat the entire postnote as raw text without automatic inclusion of a style-dependent page prefix. So when using a citation style that includes e.g. p. before the page number, the final result becomeswhile it should be
BibLaTeX requires using
\pno
in such cases in order to trigger the page prefixing manually where the postnote string is too complex for automatic inclusion. Therefore, Pandoc should export such a citation as\autocite[\pno~20, my emphasis]{Jones_2010}
. Respectively\ppno
should be used for a page range.Pandoc 2.2.1 with the command:
pandoc --read=markdown --write=latex --output=FILENAME --biblatex --top-level-division=chapter --number-sections --standalone --table-of-contents --include-in-header=header-includes.tex --include-before-body=before-body-includes.tex --bibliography=zotero.bib
(Note that an input file is missing because I use pandoc-mode in Emacs)