Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago
Work on this issue has started and should be part of the Thumbnailator 0.3.10
release.
Original comment by coobird...@gmail.com
on 28 Aug 2011 at 3:25
Original comment by coobird...@gmail.com
on 28 Aug 2011 at 3:33
When is 0.3.10 set to be released?
Original comment by littleki...@gmail.com
on 29 Aug 2011 at 7:31
I hope to get Thumbnailator 0.3.10 out on September 3rd or 4th.
Original comment by coobird...@gmail.com
on 1 Sep 2011 at 3:49
This feature has been implemented in Thumbnailator 0.3.10.
The new `scale(double, double)` method can be used to specify the scaling
factors for the width and height independently.
http://thumbnailator.googlecode.com/hg/javadoc/net/coobird/thumbnailator/Thumbna
ils.Builder.html?r=0.3.10#scale%28double,%20double%29
Original comment by coobird...@gmail.com
on 4 Sep 2011 at 3:03
Awesome! I'll check it out tomorrow! Thanks
Original comment by littleki...@gmail.com
on 7 Sep 2011 at 5:14
Never mind I was running two passes on these graphics first down to .66 and
then again to my target size I discovered if I just do it once the graphics
are very smooth not sure why two passes make it so janky. I'll just skip
the first step and do it one. Why two steps? My artist sent me some of the
graphics larger than our largest format. Thanks anyways.
Original comment by littleki...@gmail.com
on 4 Nov 2011 at 4:26
Thank you for the follow up and glad things are working out.
Regarding the images not being smooth when resizing on two steps, I reproduced
the problem you were having when scaling at 0.66, so I've opened a new issue.
(Issue 25)
Once again, thank you for your valuable feedback.
Original comment by coobird...@gmail.com
on 13 Nov 2011 at 6:15
You are welcome, I keep using it for all sorts of stuff, recently used it
for what it was meant for thumbnails for our website lol!
Original comment by littleki...@gmail.com
on 13 Nov 2011 at 8:03
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
coobird...@gmail.com
on 13 Aug 2011 at 3:22