Open jhhughes256 opened 6 years ago
With the use of the new optim.interv.dt
function it seems that even bad standard errors can result in good results (with no non-bioequivalent results using AUC and Cmax being observed).
The question now is, will refitting of bad standard errors improve the algorithm? Or is it unnecessary additional computation?
Issue Description
Standard errors derived from hessian matrices of
optim
function output could be used to assess confidence in that output.Hessian matrices could be included in final output of both broad and narrow study designs. This would then allow assessment of standard errors for the best and worst fits.