search

jhipster / generator-jhipster-jooq

JHipster blueprint for jOOQ support
Apache License 2.0
9 stars 6 forks source link

Integration into micronaut blueprint #3

Open atomfrede opened 4 years ago

atomfrede commented 4 years ago

This is more a general question. Which project would be responsible to provide support for the micronaut blueprint? Should/must/can do it this blueprint or the micronaut blueprint (if detecting this blueprint)?

murdos commented 4 years ago

I think it should be handled here, by the jooq blueprint. IMO we should add new configuration parameters in main generator to indicate the server side language and framework used by the generator project (java/spring, java/quarkus, java/micronaut, kotlin/spring, ...) and ease a blueprint such as jooq one to decide if it's compatible with server technologies.

lukaseder commented 4 years ago

I'll be watching this project and will reply to any strictly jOOQ-related questions. From my experience with this third party contribution here: https://github.com/etiennestuder/gradle-jooq-plugin, maybe 30% - 50% of all questions might be strictly jOOQ-related

mshima commented 4 years ago

I think it should be handled here, by the jooq blueprint. IMO we should add new configuration parameters in main generator to indicate the server side language and framework used by the generator project (java/spring, java/quarkus, java/micronaut, kotlin/spring, ...) and ease a blueprint such as jooq one to decide if it's compatible with server technologies.

Agreed.