Closed pascalgrimaud closed 4 months ago
@pascalgrimaud : could it be tech.jhipster.lite.extension
?
Why not, need to find a project name too And waiting @murdos 's idea too
How about tech.jhipster.lite.extensions
?
Unless we only plan to host one extension module (the banner one), using plurals seem to be a good idea.
How about
tech.jhipster.lite.extensions
? Unless we only plan to host one extension module (the banner one), using plurals seem to be a good idea.
It could be a place to let contributors create modules that don't fit in the jhipster-lite. Could it be?
So, it could be:
PackageName tech.jhipster.lite.extensions
Project Name JHlite Extensions Application
Base Name jhliteExtensionsApplication
Let me know, WDYT 😃👍
No, I don't want additional modules here, I want this project as sample to create a custom jhlite, that's all
No, I don't want additional modules here, I want this project as sample to create a custom jhlite, that's all
So the singular is the better choice here:
PackageName tech.jhipster.lite.extension
Project Name JHlite Extension Application
Base Name jhliteExtensionApplication
WDYT?
Base name: jhliteExtension would be enough
Project name: JHLite Extension Application (L in upper case)
Thanks 👍
No, I don't want additional modules here, I want this project as sample to create a custom jhlite, that's all
Fine. Then I guess we should include the word "sample" somewhere. E.g. in the description: "JHLite Sample Extension Application".
I think application should reserved to real generated app.
What about :
Another idea?
I think it could be JHLite Extension Sample
To resume:
PackageName tech.jhipster.lite.extension
Project Name JHLite Extension Sample
Base Name JHLiteExtensionSample
Choosing the default options like com.mycompany etc, are not good It should be discussed and changed