/CustomerAuditServiceImpl.java:441:9: '}' at column 9 should be on the same line as the next part of a multi-block statement (one that directly contains multiple blocks: if/else-if/else, do/while or try/catch/finally). [RightCurly]
Prettier-Java 2.5.0
Input:
I apologize, this hot mess is so long, but I'm wondering if that's part of what's causing the problem. I added a violation in the code here.
if (
isAddNode &&
(NODE_CARD.equalsIgnoreCase(nodeLabel) ||
NODE_PERSON.equalsIgnoreCase(nodeLabel) ||
NODE_ADDRESS.equalsIgnoreCase(nodeLabel) ||
NODE_PHONE.equalsIgnoreCase(nodeLabel) ||
NODE_HOUSEHOLD.equalsIgnoreCase(nodeLabel))
) {
} else if (isNodePropChange && !StringUtils.isEmpty(getPropertiesAsString(audit))) {
String propString = getPropertiesAsString(audit);
String keyNumber = ignoreUuids(primaryKey);
responseString = String.format("Change to POSID: %s - %s", keyNumber, propString);
}
// Attributes (which are relations)
else if (isAddRelation && isAttributeType) { // ** VIOLATION **
// TX Template: SetLoyaltyAttribute_A
// Seems like this will also handle Un/Enroll Customer and NationalRewards
String attrName = getAttributeName(audit);
responseString = String.format("Attribute %s added with value %s", attrName, propValue);
} else if (isChangeRelation && isAttributeType) {
Expected behavior:
...
I'm not sure this is wrong per prettier, but I don't see a way to fix per checkstyle either. Please leave open until one or the other can be resolved.
Prettier JavaScript keeps the comment in this position (example), so I don't think we will change the formatting of this. We could potentially update the Checkstyle configuration that we provide.
Prettier-Java 2.5.0
Input:
I apologize, this hot mess is so long, but I'm wondering if that's part of what's causing the problem. I added a violation in the code here.
Expected behavior:
...
I'm not sure this is wrong per prettier, but I don't see a way to fix per checkstyle either. Please leave open until one or the other can be resolved.