Open jhqiu21 opened 1 week ago
We allowed the users to follow whatever naming convention/system they wanted. It is not a requirement for the name in ContactMate to follow the legal name of the elderly, as there is already identification done by the NRIC
field. In addition, it is possible that our target user might have their own internal naming system, consisting of numbers. Whether or not we want to restrict the name validation to completely reject names only consisting of numbers will require further discussion with our target user, which is not in the current scope of the project.
We changed this to low as the product can still be used and in the rare event our target user unintentionally set the name to a number, it will not cause a lot of inconvenience for these reasons below:
Team chose [response.NotInScope
]
Reason for disagreement: [replace this with your explanation]
Note that a person's name should not be a number like
123
, while the system allows this operation without any warning message.Example:
add i/S6878830G n/123 t/wheelchairUser e/betsycrowe@example.com a/Blk30 Geylang Street 28, #06-48 p/1234567 c/2
Expect: The system do not allow simply put only number at name field, or the system will raise a warning message when user input only number to inform them to check the name again.