TIMS/TermHub: Common format/source?

jhu-bids / TermHub

Web app and CLI tools for working with biomedical terminologies. https://github.com/orgs/jhu-bids/projects/9/views/7

https://bit.ly/termhub

GNU General Public License v3.0

8 stars 10 forks source link

TIMS/TermHub: Common format/source? #281

Open joeflack4 opened 1 year ago

joeflack4 commented 1 year ago

Overview

(Just a brain dump)

LinkML relevancy
- OMOP::FHIR?
- Not needed if we use OAK for queries instead of querying our OMOP tables?
- Not needed if we prefer to fetch from a TIMS source other than FHIR?
- ValueSet definitions?
- ConceptMap definitions?
Formats
- Semsql?
- OWL?
- FHIR
- FHIR NPM packages?
- FHIR REST calls?
- OMOP?

joeflack4 commented 1 year ago

Not sure if this is the best place to make the issue but need somewhere central for this discussion.

hugwuoke commented 1 year ago

Is this still a useful format for this information?

joeflack4 commented 1 year ago

Marking this with low urgency. This is still relevant information and these data formats are still relevant. We are already moving forward with actually using OAK and converting OMOP to OWL as a common data format / data source between the 2 projects. But there are still other considerations.

Also just added to the TIMS/TermHub grouping issue:

jhu-bids / TermHub

TIMS/TermHub: Common format/source? #281

Overview

263