Closed genegodbold closed 3 years ago
@genegodbold I think this is fair as a concept to represent. However, these gene products are made by the pathogen and act on the pathogen. That isn't necessarily a basis for exclusion, but it does mean it doesn't work under 'modulates host immune function'. Perhaps this should go in the indirect branch. "mediates passive immune evasion" strikes me as too generic, maybe "dampens recognition by host innate immune system"? Also not particularly satisfying...
@jproesch Let's work with your second suggestion; how about something like "modifies parasite molecule to decrease host immune recognition"?
My one concern is whether this definition is broad enough to include something like Lic2b (number 7 above) or MprF (number 10 above)? Their activity is designed to avoid complement and antimicrobial peptide activity--those obviously are NOT pattern recognition receptors but rather immune effectors. They are avoiding "detection" by those particular effectors, though.
@genegodbold I think the definition can be broad enough to include avoiding complement and AMPs
@jproesch Wait, wait--I want to include them!
@genegodbold yes, I think you can with the definition I wrote! :)
So I've documented ~80 sequences of concern with enzymatic activity of various sorts, the "goal" of which (and putting aside teleology, certainly the effect of which) seems to be to decrease the recognition of a microbial associated molecular pattern (MAMP) OR something normally targeted by a host immune effector.
So these parasite proteins are modifying parasite features that the host innate immune system normally recognizes. The enzymatic activity in question alters the feature so as to render it less reactive/less susceptible to recognition by (say) host pattern recognition receptors, cationic antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) or complement.
I have been calling these things examples of "passive" immune evasion to differentiate them from active things that directly affect host immune effectors. So this "class" of things acts on the target of the host immune detector or effector and NOT on the effector itself.
Should this be a "thing" in the ontology? I think it should be noted (somehow) that something is having this sort of effect, even though it is not directly affecting the host.
Some examples:
Attribution
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5702-4690