This may be specific to this particular dataset, but for Kasthuri/ac4/em, .available_mips (through CloudVolume) gives hierarchy levels [0, 1, 2, 3], but on the BossDB API site and with intern (via .available_resolutions), it says num hierarchy levels is 1. However, downsampling with resolution=1 / mips=1 is still possible on intern and CloudVolume. Is there a way to standardize hierarchy levels across API site/CloudVolume/possible downsampling resolutions?
This might just be a bookkeeping mismatch — great find btw! We might want to pass downsample-level boss API calls through to cvdb to check the underlying filesystem...
This may be specific to this particular dataset, but for
Kasthuri/ac4/em
,.available_mips
(through CloudVolume) gives hierarchy levels [0, 1, 2, 3], but on the BossDB API site and with intern (via.available_resolutions
), it says num hierarchy levels is 1. However, downsampling with resolution=1 / mips=1 is still possible on intern and CloudVolume. Is there a way to standardize hierarchy levels across API site/CloudVolume/possible downsampling resolutions?