search

jiangtiandao / flexlib

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/flexlib
0 stars 0 forks source link

When using the WindowShade Container when pressing Tab after the last Form element a hidden rectangular area is selected. #262

Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 8 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Tab through the elements of a form inside a WindowShade container
2. After pressing Tab on the last element, a hidden rectangular area is 
seleted right underneath the WindowShade title.
3. After pressing Tab again the desired next element is selected.

What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
I would have expected the focus to have jumped either on the WindowShade 
Header or the next input element in the page.

What version of the product are you using? On what operating system?
Flexlib-2.4

Please provide any additional information below.
After having this problem, I copied the example code from the download of 
the WindowShade component into my application. All the CSS Styles needed 
are available. The WindowShades are all included in Modules that are 
dynamically loaded by a main Loader Application.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by christof...@c-ware.de on 20 Nov 2009 at 3:02

Attachments:

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
I have exactly the same problem. It's rather annoying, particularly when you 
try to make an app "accessible", as the "focused area" -through TAB - does not 
reflect what is actually selected.

Original comment by cotas...@gmail.com on 10 Aug 2010 at 1:11

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
me also

Original comment by dominiqu...@gmail.com on 10 Aug 2010 at 1:26

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
My mistake : peeking at the source code, you can read in the latest version: 

(windowShade.as, line 267 : 

            // Fix for Issue #85
            _headerButton.tabEnabled = false;

Issue 85 [http://code.google.com/p/flexlib/issues/detail?id=85] is indeed 
marked as solved. This one is just a duplicate, so consider it fixed also.

Original comment by cotas...@gmail.com on 11 Aug 2010 at 12:48