what is the rational of having these inter areas? especialy between the mono-di-tri nucleotides.
is there a biological significance, for these cut-offs?
I would split the bam file based on the fragment length coverage as nucleosome free (0-150), mononucleosome (150-peak220-290)
dinucleosome (314 -peak384 -454), and this is based on the identified peaks and removing/adding 70 nucleotides from the peak that correspond to the nucleosome size.
regarding the nucleosome free, I would accept it is quite flux. But for betwwen the nucleosomes especially when we talking of a succession of mono-di-tri-etc and we know that 147 bases are wrapt around nucleosomes.
Also what to define as nucleosome free is a bit arbitary I am not sure what to expect there.
It is totally depend on you. Those setting are just trying to repeat the GreenLeaf Lab plots as they described in section Nucleosome positioning of their paper https://www.nature.com/articles/nmeth.2688.
Hi there, The default option in splitGAlignmentsByCut() for splitting is defined by:
what is the rational of having these inter areas? especialy between the mono-di-tri nucleotides. is there a biological significance, for these cut-offs? I would split the bam file based on the fragment length coverage as nucleosome free (0-150), mononucleosome (150-peak220-290) dinucleosome (314 -peak384 -454), and this is based on the identified peaks and removing/adding 70 nucleotides from the peak that correspond to the nucleosome size. regarding the nucleosome free, I would accept it is quite flux. But for betwwen the nucleosomes especially when we talking of a succession of mono-di-tri-etc and we know that 147 bases are wrapt around nucleosomes. Also what to define as nucleosome free is a bit arbitary I am not sure what to expect there.