Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 9 years ago
That's right, We will work on it as soon as possible.
Best regards and thanks.
Original comment by mind....@gmail.com
on 8 Dec 2011 at 1:31
[deleted comment]
Maybe it would be easier to write a good regex for urlregexplist or
headerregexplist? Also because the current forceGoogleSafeSearch allows the
user to bypass it by adding some slashes, for example:
http://www.google.com.br//////search?q=badword. The slashes could be handled
with the regex too.
Original comment by teresaejunior
on 8 Dec 2011 at 2:01
Ok but Comment 3 is another issue, I will create it separately when I start to
fix it.
Original comment by mind....@gmail.com
on 2 Apr 2012 at 6:14
OK, thanks! I just meant if it would not be easier to have the regexes, which
also work on transparent proxy, instead of hardcoding the SafeSearch in C++...
just an idea.
Original comment by teresaejunior
on 2 Apr 2012 at 8:31
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
teresaejunior
on 5 Dec 2011 at 10:31