Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
Since an incorrect password can cause an error, this behaviour will stay as it
is.
Original comment by paracel...@gmail.com
on 4 Feb 2013 at 6:30
But, what's the point of having empty files?
Original comment by jaimem...@gmail.com
on 4 Feb 2013 at 6:32
Oh, I thought this was about the delete-archive-after-extraction option. Failed
files should always be deleted if you click cancel, and always be kept if you
press continue. If there is some case where either does not happen, that is a
bug.
Failed files are kept when you click continue because they may be partially
extracted and still useful.
Original comment by paracel...@gmail.com
on 4 Feb 2013 at 6:46
Ok, but I've been testing with a zip file with password and when the password
is wrong it just creates an empty file. It has just one file, but you can
imagine a zip with more protected files, extracting on your desktop without
creating a root folder, it would fill your desktop with files that cannot be
used for anything, and you will have to delete them manually.
Original comment by jaimem...@gmail.com
on 4 Feb 2013 at 6:57
The tested zip doesnn't produce a bug, it has one protected file and other file
with no password. So the last one extracts, but the other is empty.
Original comment by jaimem...@gmail.com
on 4 Feb 2013 at 6:59
My point is that the file should be removed when the password is wrong.
Original comment by jaimem...@gmail.com
on 4 Feb 2013 at 6:59
But are you pressing "Stop" or "Continue"?
Original comment by paracel...@gmail.com
on 4 Feb 2013 at 7:06
Continue (on the unarchiver).
I understand that if I don't want to have the empty files I should press stop,
but if I don't know the password it would be good to just extract the rest of
files.
Original comment by jaimem...@gmail.com
on 4 Feb 2013 at 7:48
I don't really see a situation where the current behavior isn't sufficient.
It's also quite consistent, so I don't really want to change it without good
reason.
Original comment by paracel...@gmail.com
on 4 Feb 2013 at 8:03
Understood
Original comment by jaimem...@gmail.com
on 4 Feb 2013 at 8:04
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
jaimem...@gmail.com
on 4 Feb 2013 at 6:15Attachments: