Closed gangweiX closed 6 months ago
I test generalize ability of GwcNet on KITTI and Middlebury using the official pretrained model, the result is 12.5% on KITTI 2012, 12.4% on KITTI 2015. But in your paper, it is 20.2% and 22.7%. Can I know how you tested?
Very sorry to reply late. It puzzles us as well. It seems our retrained GWCNet gets a different generalization performance than the official pre-trained checkpoint despite we follow the original implementation. Since we observe similar results in other works(DSMNet...), we report the results in our experiments.
[NOTICE] Zhang Jiawei(Gary) deleted my workspace without notice, which containes data and network models of a paper under review.
I test generalize ability of GwcNet on KITTI and Middlebury using the official pretrained model, the result is 12.5% on KITTI 2012, 12.4% on KITTI 2015. But in your paper, it is 20.2% and 22.7%. Can I know how you tested?