Open jiaweiteo opened 3 years ago
The images are not repetitive. Adding a warehouse requires the address
field while adding a supplier requires the email
field.
In addition, these two images are placed under separate sections and for each section, the UG has minimally one image and at most two images. As such, it would not be considered as repetitive.
Team chose [response.Rejected
]
Reason for disagreement: I believe that the images are uneccessary repetitive as there is no need to have many different individual images that has minor changes for the same command. For example, the delete
command have 4 different images in the UG with little changes to the images. (Only the result display section is changed) I feel that it is unecessary to add an image per one specific command in the UG as it made the user guide uncessary long and hence, this should be considered a documentation bug. (E.g. The delete
command can have one image only to show readers what the command generally does, instead of having 4 similar images that have little changes to it.)
Team chose [severity.VeryLow
]
Originally [severity.Medium
]
Reason for disagreement: [replace this with your explanation]
Too many repetitive images under the features section. There may not be a need to have an image for each specific command, even though there is only a minor change.
Etc.
add ct/s
andadd ct/w
can just have one image instead of 2 different images since they are showing very similar details.