[09:56] @BinGOs what version of CPANPLUS do you have ?
[09:56] < drin> not the newest one on cpan I don't think
[09:56] < drin> it's a package managed by my archlinux distro
[09:57] < drin> it's...
[09:57] < drin> .9121
[09:57] @BinGOs cool thanks.
[09:57] < drin> yearp
[09:58] < drin> oh nvm
[09:58] < drin> it works now
[09:58] < drin> so, really weird though
[09:58] < drin> BinGOs: by enabling SQLite as the source engine if I do 'cpanp m ' it gives me the error
[09:58] < drin> but if I remove the file and do a 'cpanp i' instead of 'cpanp m' then it rebuilt the author tree, rebuilt the module tree
[09:59] < drin> and now it works
[09:59] < drin> so must be different preparation steps for searching with m instead of installing with i?
[10:03] @BinGOs it sounds like a quirk if it isn't checking whether the index is built or not when doing the 'm'
[10:04] @BinGOs it gives me something to try and reproduce anyways, thanks.
[10:04] < drin> yeah, definitely sounds quirky
bingos
commented
12 years ago
[09:56] @BinGOs what version of CPANPLUS do you have ? [09:56] < drin> not the newest one on cpan I don't think [09:56] < drin> it's a package managed by my archlinux distro [09:57] < drin> it's... [09:57] < drin> .9121 [09:57] @BinGOs cool thanks. [09:57] < drin> yearp [09:58] < drin> oh nvm [09:58] < drin> it works now [09:58] < drin> so, really weird though [09:58] < drin> BinGOs: by enabling SQLite as the source engine if I do 'cpanp m' it gives me the error
[09:58] < drin> but if I remove the file and do a 'cpanp i' instead of 'cpanp m' then it rebuilt the author tree, rebuilt the module tree
[09:59] < drin> and now it works
[09:59] < drin> so must be different preparation steps for searching with m instead of installing with i?
[10:03] @BinGOs it sounds like a quirk if it isn't checking whether the index is built or not when doing the 'm'
[10:04] @BinGOs it gives me something to try and reproduce anyways, thanks.
[10:04] < drin> yeah, definitely sounds quirky