Open jibtaf opened 10 months ago
This issue is marked as duplicate as this also mentions the design of pi/PATIENT_INDEX.
[The team marked this bug as a duplicate of the following bug]
Unnecessarily complicated command formats for add-prescription, edit-prescription and delete-prescription commands
The format for the commands are:
add-prescription APPOINTMENT_INDEX pi/PATIENT_INDEX mn/MEDICATION_NAME...
,edit-prescription APPOINTMENT_INDEX pi/PATIENT_INDEX mn/MEDICATION_NAME...
anddelete-prescription APPOINTMENT_INDEX pi/PATIENT_INDEX
. In my opinion, thepi/patient-index
does not seem to be necessary since the users should perform this command after doinglist-appointments patient-index
, then it does not add more value to probably add/edit/delete another patient's prescriptions here.
[original: nus-cs2103-AY2324S1/pe-interim#3995] [original labels: severity.Low type.FeatureFlaw]
[This is the team's response to the above 'original' bug]
Thank you for the issue.
Just to note that there are duplicate issues as all the issues mention the design of pi/PATIENT_INDEX
Items for the Tester to Verify
:question: Issue duplicate status
Team chose to mark this issue as a duplicate of another issue (as explained in the Team's response above)
Reason for disagreement: [replace this with your explanation]
The format for this command is:
edit-appt APPOINTMENT_INDEX pi/patient-index [d/DATE] [t/TIME]
. In my opinion, thepi/patient-index
does not seem to be necessary since the users should perform this command after doinglist-appointments patient-index
, then it does not add more value to probably edit another patient's appointment here.