Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
ERRATA: The line ...
ELE 60 105% -> AIL --- H
... should be ...
ELE 60 100% -> AIL --- H
Original comment by gru...@gmail.com
on 10 Oct 2011 at 8:15
There's another problem ...
To get this to work right at all, I have to specify a negative switch for the
full rate lines. This should not be necessary. Here's what I have to do to make
it work the same as the old r569 system ...
==============================
EXPO/DR
RUD 50 50 AIL
60 100 !AIL
ELE 26 45 AIL
60 100 !AIL
THR
AIL 20 60 AIL
60 100 !AIL
==============================
This is incorrect, in my view. It should be that the lines with no switch
assigned should be active (like the default setting) if none of the other lines
for that channel are active.
I this could be taken care of using flight modes instead. But without flight
modes being used, it should still work as just a simple EXPO/DR switch, as I
have described.
No?
Original comment by gru...@gmail.com
on 10 Oct 2011 at 8:25
Yes, you are right.
Original comment by bson...@gmail.com
on 10 Oct 2011 at 9:52
Same bug in companion9x as well.
Original comment by bson...@gmail.com
on 10 Oct 2011 at 2:26
It was more complex. Previously the expos were ALL applied in the order they
came. Therefore it was needed to have the default at first and the specific to
a switch, flight phase next.
I have to say that this logic is a report from th9x. It doesn't correspond to
my (and your) logic. I prefer when specific is first and general (default) is
at the end.
Moreover, it should save some us: only one expo will be calculated for a stick.
There could be many before.
More tests needed (should I say ... as for each of my commits)!
Bertrand.
Original comment by bson...@gmail.com
on 10 Oct 2011 at 7:40
Tested and verified. Well done, again!
Original comment by gru...@gmail.com
on 10 Oct 2011 at 9:51
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
gru...@gmail.com
on 10 Oct 2011 at 8:10Attachments: