Is the NO_ATL cppdefine obsolete?

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Is the comment in http://code.google.com/apis/talk/libjingle/samples.html about 
NO_ATL still correct?

I don't have the ATL libraries on XP, but devicemanager.cc still includes 
<atlbase.h> whether NO_ATL is defined or not.

Seems like this is an obsolete comment and that there is no way to build 
without having the ATL libraries.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by mself....@gmail.com on 22 Apr 2011 at 8:42

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Are you able to fix this issue?
I am getting below error
c:\p2p_code\libjingle-0.5.2\talk\session\phone\devicemanager.cc(31) : fatal erro
r C1083: Cannot open include file: 'atlbase.h': No such file or directory
scons: *** [build\dbg\obj\session\phone\devicemanager.obj] Error 2
scons: building terminated because of errors.

I don't know how to fix this error. I am using Windows 7 and VC++ 2010 express 
edition.
Thanks you any hints

Original comment by krishna....@gmail.com on 27 Apr 2011 at 8:16

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Download Platform SDK 
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/en/details.aspx?FamilyId=0BAF2B35-C656-4969-A
CE8-E4C0C0716ADB&displaylang=en

Original comment by jun...@google.com on 12 May 2011 at 6:41

• Changed state: Done

[GoogleCodeExporter]

That link does not work anymore, and by platform SDK do you mean Windows 7, xp, 
etc - depending on what you are running? 

I have the same problem as Krishna =[

Original comment by matthewa...@gmail.com on 17 Oct 2012 at 9:30