Closed selairi closed 5 years ago
This a simple fix to #442 bug. It only changes the code from:
` if(m) retval = _.multiply(m, retval);
if(img) retval = _.multiply(img, retval); //put back the sign that was removed earlier
if(sign < 0) retval.power.negate();`
to
` if(sign < 0) retval.power.negate();
if(m) retval = _.multiply(m, retval);
if(img) retval = _.multiply(img, retval); //put back the sign that was removed earlier ` in line 5974.
@selairi thanks. Can you add a test for this fix as well?
This a simple fix to #442 bug. It only changes the code from:
` if(m) retval = _.multiply(m, retval);
if(img) retval = _.multiply(img, retval); //put back the sign that was removed earlier
if(sign < 0) retval.power.negate();`
to
` if(sign < 0) retval.power.negate();
if(m) retval = _.multiply(m, retval);
if(img) retval = _.multiply(img, retval); //put back the sign that was removed earlier ` in line 5974.