Closed Saikedo closed 5 years ago
It seems like a negative vale of the csc is ignored and we have a bug where csc(x) = csc(-x) for all x.
By looking at the code I noticed that we apply absolute value on the symbol but I am not sure why. Any idea why?
@jiggzson Nevermind. Already fixed the issue and will push soon.
Fixed with #499
It seems like a negative vale of the csc is ignored and we have a bug where csc(x) = csc(-x) for all x.
By looking at the code I noticed that we apply absolute value on the symbol but I am not sure why. Any idea why?