jignesh88 / hpcalc-iphone

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/hpcalc-iphone
GNU General Public License v2.0
0 stars 0 forks source link

Problems with user mode #53

Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. In user mode, entering a label seems to also produce a R/S
2.
3.

What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
In non-user mode, entering (f)(lbl)(A), then R/S will cause the program to
run, but in user mode entering (A) causes the program to run as well.

What version of the product are you using? On what operating system?
V 1.3 on an itouch running 2.2.1

Please provide any additional information below.
I'm attempting to reproduce the program listed starting on p. 29 of the HP
15c Advanced Functions Handbook which should allow one to do financial
calculations.  It involves setting up a series of subroutines with labels
A-E and after loading in variables into 4 of the five, solves for the fifth
variable.  I have had limited success getting the code to work (i.e. it
gave me the correct answer once), generally resulting in an Error 4 most of
the other times.  Disturbing is that it isn't reproducible.  I'm starting
with the specific example of p. 35 involving a mortgage.  In "user" mode it
gallops off without letting me do anything and has never resulted in a
correct answer, but in non-user mode it has resulted in the correct answer
once.  Perhaps I have not coded it correctly, but I've walked through the
code line-by-line and it seems correct from here.  If I had never gotten a
correct answer I could accept that it was my inability to type in the steps
properly.

Rgds,

Sean

Original issue reported on code.google.com by brens...@gmail.com on 24 Apr 2009 at 7:28

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
[deleted comment]
GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Ok, I programmed up my real 15C and am getting the same behavior, i.e. a 
"running"
comment after hitting a label in "user" mode.  Now both machines are acting the 
same
and are giving valid answers. You can remove this one from your "defect" list.  
I
apologize for posting before testing on the real machine.

Rgds,

Sean

Original comment by brens...@gmail.com on 25 Apr 2009 at 7:40

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Original comment by tomf...@gmail.com on 24 Oct 2009 at 1:49