Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
Original comment by manuel.carrasco.m
on 13 Feb 2011 at 12:32
Manuel,
any update on this enhancement?
Original comment by guangyu....@gmail.com
on 18 Feb 2011 at 1:04
Manuel,
Are you on holiday? Could you give me a package including aforementioned
enhancement?
Thanks.
Guangyu
Original comment by guangyu....@gmail.com
on 3 Mar 2011 at 1:40
Sorry, unfortunately I'm not on holiday. I'm overworked with my job and
spending my free time in the new release of gwtquery. I promise to do it soon
(no more than 2 days).
Original comment by manuel.carrasco.m
on 3 Mar 2011 at 3:45
any update?
Original comment by guangyu....@gmail.com
on 16 Mar 2011 at 11:48
This issue was closed by revision r873.
Original comment by manuel.carrasco.m
on 22 Mar 2011 at 9:27
Hello,
The issue should be fixed, now it is possible to add elements to the panel
specifying the order.
If you are using jsupload just take a look to the example:
http://code.google.com/p/gwtupload/source/browse/trunk/GwtUpload/jsupload/src/ma
in/java/jsupload/public/JsUpload.html#83
To enable php apc with gwtupload take a look to the example:
http://code.google.com/p/gwtupload/source/browse/trunk/GwtUpload/samples/src/mai
n/java/gwtuploadsample/client/SingleUploadSample.java#67
I have added your php code, modified to produce xml responses to the sources. I
have not tested it, if you test it or improve it send a comment to this issue.
Thanks for contributing, and I apologize for the long delay fixing the issue.
- Manolo
Original comment by man...@talkwheel.com
on 22 Mar 2011 at 10:20
Hi Manolo,
Thanks a lot for making the enhancement happen under high job load. I tested
the 0.6.4 snapshot jsupload. Basically, PHP APC file upload progress mechanism
works after this enhancement. But I encountered some problem on the progress
bar on browser side:
1)for files of small size (say less than 200K), Chrome(10.0.648.127) and
Firefox(3.6.16) will freeze on progress 0%, although the file is actually
uploaded to server side. I checked the access log of Apache, In the condition,
there was no GET filename request after POST request. But IE 7 is OK for this
case.
2)for files of large size (> 15M), for Chrome and Firefox, the progress bar
always stuck at the point right before the server returns 100%. In comparison,
IE7 succeed to reach 100% and Done status in most cases but stuck occasionally.
I checked the access log, the browser continuously issue the GET progress
request after the file is completely uploaded. To confirm the server's respond
message, I revised the perl and PHP cgi script to write the response message to
a log file and confirm the server respond with 100% progress accordingly. It
seems the client side totally ignore the message.
I also confirm above two problems is also with the jsupload.cgi.pl. It seems
some regression bug is introduced in this snapshot release.
Could you please have a look?
Thanks,
Guangyu
Original comment by guangyu....@gmail.com
on 25 Mar 2011 at 8:40
Attachments:
Hello, I have modified your php script so as it works fine with 0.6.4-SNAPSHOT.
Download it from:
http://gwtupload.googlecode.com/svn-history/r880/trunk/GwtUpload/jsupload/src/ma
in/java/jsupload/public/jsupload.php
And use latest snapshot.
I have tested it and seems to work quite well, please check that it works for
you and review the code to make suggestions.
btw: Also I have fixed the perl script version to work with latest release.
Thank you very much for your contribution
- Manolo
Original comment by manuel.carrasco.m
on 11 Apr 2011 at 10:55
Hi Manolo,
I tested the new script and I'm very happy to see it works very well. Thank you
for your great job.
Two minor issue regarding jsupload.php:
1. session_start() at line#79 should be moved before line#63 where session_id()
is called, since session_id() can return current session id only after the
invocation of session_start().
2. delete .info file when remove action is requested
Best regards,
Guangyu
Original comment by guangyu....@gmail.com
on 16 Apr 2011 at 11:22
Attachments:
Committed in r888
Thank you very much.
- Manolo
Original comment by manuel.carrasco.m
on 18 Apr 2011 at 6:42
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
guangyu....@gmail.com
on 8 Feb 2011 at 3:31Attachments: