Closed harold closed 3 years ago
Or, I guess maybe (:refer-clojure :exclude [identity])
in utils.
Hi there,
Your message found me on my second day of holidays, hence the late reply...
This is not really a major (or even minor) issue, but I can see how it can be somewhat annoying. I will :refer-exclude
(per your suggestion) in the next release (sometime this week I hope).
By the way, duratoms can now be distributed - see hazel-atom. I can help you set that up if you need to. Alternatively, you can see an example here.
Hope that helps ;) Kind regards
😄 No worries on late reply, and yes, this is indeed minor, so no rush on the fix.
Glad you're around and still interested. I say it every time, but we love this library and use it literally 24hrs a day to store so so so much stuff.
Thank you!
PS. distributed sounds like an interesting direction. I'll keep my brain open to opportunities to use that. Thank you again.
Any prognosis when 0.5.3 is going to be released? You can't put a price on a CI pipeline that passes without warnings :wink:
Hi guys,
Apologies for the wait - 0.5.3 is out and it contains a single change (the addition of a :refer-exclude
clause in utils.clj).
Cheers :+1:
Great! Thank you.
Can you push this commit: https://github.com/jimpil/duratom/commit/8cfc7d9d889d4e7fada72bb3315d890296d6de3f
Linked from here: https://clojars.org/duratom
You're the best.
Done :+1:
Very very cool. Thank you. Stay rad.
This morning I started seeing this:
Guessing it's caused by this line: https://github.com/jimpil/duratom/blob/d481707e8a5dee342133b2eea25fc86f2be2a2b6/src/clojure/duratom/utils.clj#L152
So maybe these: https://github.com/jimpil/duratom/blob/fc630c96d0f3125c6dd85120fda094093ddec6a6/src/clojure/duratom/core.clj#L55 https://github.com/jimpil/duratom/blob/fc630c96d0f3125c6dd85120fda094093ddec6a6/src/clojure/duratom/core.clj#L67
Could instead say:
:smile:
Hope you're well. As ever, thanks for duratom, we still have zillions of nippy duratoms with gigabytes of stuff in them and we love it.