Reduce code duplication by making .wrap() an extension method

[jinyus]

Status

READY/IN DEVELOPMENT/HOLD

Description

Breaking: wrap no longer returns the instance of wrapper as that is redundant and makes the code more complicated for no real benefit.

• [ ] ✨ New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• [x] 🛠️ Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• [ ] ❌ Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
• [x] 🧹 Code refactor
• [ ] ✅ Build configuration change
• [ ] 📝 Documentation
• [ ] 🗑️ Chore

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

Comparison is base (6fc381d) 100.00% compared to head (cf75f5b) 100.00%. Report is 12 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #37 +/- ## ========================================= Coverage 100.00% 100.00% ========================================= Files 32 34 +2 Lines 809 810 +1 ========================================= + Hits 809 810 +1 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/jinyus/dart_beacon/pull/37/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=jinyus) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [unittests](https://app.codecov.io/gh/jinyus/dart_beacon/pull/37/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=jinyus) | `100.00% <100.00%> (ø)` | | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=jinyus#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.