jinzihan2002 / pe

0 stars 0 forks source link

`help` does not show how the `help` command works #2

Open jinzihan2002 opened 2 weeks ago

jinzihan2002 commented 2 weeks ago

image.png How to reproduce:

Although help is a valid command that is available when checking commands, it is listed as a invalid command when checked using help.

While trivial, perhaps help could be accepted as a valid command under help, and its function is displayed.

nus-se-bot commented 1 week ago

Team's Response

We appreciate the feedback! However, the help command's functionality is in our UG, and for a brief explanation, it can be found in through the commands command (found in the last line of the screenshot below)! Hence, in our opinion, using the help command on a help command is not necessary.

image.png

Items for the Tester to Verify

:question: Issue response

Team chose [response.Rejected]

Reason for disagreement: While using help command on help may not seem necessary, help is still a valid function as per the UG and is available under commands, thus I believe it is still a bug that the current application considers it an "Invalid command" when help is ran on it. Even if it doesn't seem necessary, it would be more appropriate to just display help's purpose, instead of considering it an invalid command.