Closed amedinaaa closed 1 month ago
Why hide them? I actually find them really useful went I want to copy links to specific sections.
If those hashes are solely for copying links for specific sections, I think a copy icon or perhaps the word "copy" might be a lot more intuitive for users/readers looking to share a link.
Exactly what @shawnchin says. They are meant to be able to copy the links.
What happened?
Adding in the issue reporting template:
Provide Detailed Information: Only pertains to the handbook.
Description of the Issue: It looks like several pages of the handbook contain hash links to specific references to subsections within the handbook. The links in themselves are perfectly fine but is it possible we can further hide the "hashes" instead of just setting the opacity to zero? I'm thinking of maybe adding a "display: none" to the "hash-link" class.
Screenshot:
Reproduction Steps:
Expected Behavior: We should ideally completely hide these hash links to readers.
Actual Behavior: "Hashes" are apparent when hovering over subsection titles.
Platform
Browser / app / sdk version
Chrome Version: 126.0.6478.127
Relevant log output
No response
Reproducibility
More details?
No response