Closed erikkjellgren closed 7 years ago
This is not a bug. DALTON (as well as Gaussian, for cc-pVTZ) is doing the calculation using spherical Gaussians. The mmd
code does the calculations with Cartesian Gaussians. Look at the orbital number: mmd
had 15 MOs, whereas DALTON has 14 MOs.
In Gaussian, using spherical gaussians: Input:
#p rhf/cc-pvtz
helium
0 1
He
Output:
Alpha occ. eigenvalues -- -0.91763
Alpha virt. eigenvalues -- 0.63664 1.50051 1.50051 1.50051 4.60856
Alpha virt. eigenvalues -- 6.35760 6.35760 6.35760 6.35760 6.35760
Alpha virt. eigenvalues -- 7.84836 7.84836 7.84836
Whereas in Gaussian, with Cartesian gaussians (note 6D keyword) gives: Input:
#p rhf/cc-pvtz 6D
helium
0 1
He
Output:
Alpha occ. eigenvalues -- -0.91763
Alpha virt. eigenvalues -- 0.59015 1.50051 1.50051 1.50051 3.44177
Alpha virt. eigenvalues -- 6.35760 6.35760 6.35760 6.35760 6.35760
Alpha virt. eigenvalues -- 7.84835 7.84835 7.84835 8.33659
Thus Gaussian agrees with both sets of orbital energies.
Oh I feel stupid now. I thought that the orbital energies had some physical significans, and thus should have been independent of coordinate system.
Fra: Joshua Goings notifications@github.com Sendt: 11. juli 2017 02:02:00 Til: jjgoings/McMurchie-Davidson Cc: Erik Kjellgren; Author Emne: Re: [jjgoings/McMurchie-Davidson] Wrong orbital energy of He with cc-pVTZ (#2)
This is not a bug. DALTON (as well as Gaussian, for cc-pVTZ) is doing the calculation using spherical Gaussians. The mmd code does the calculations with Cartesian Gaussians. Look at the orbital number: mmd had 15 MOs, whereas DALTON has 14 MOs.
In Gaussian, using spherical gaussians: Input:
helium
0 1 He
Output:
Alpha occ. eigenvalues -- -0.91763 Alpha virt. eigenvalues -- 0.63664 1.50051 1.50051 1.50051 4.60856 Alpha virt. eigenvalues -- 6.35760 6.35760 6.35760 6.35760 6.35760 Alpha virt. eigenvalues -- 7.84836 7.84836 7.84836
Whereas in Gaussian, with Cartesian gaussians (note 6D keyword) gives: Input:
helium
0 1 He
Output:
Alpha occ. eigenvalues -- -0.91763 Alpha virt. eigenvalues -- 0.59015 1.50051 1.50051 1.50051 3.44177 Alpha virt. eigenvalues -- 6.35760 6.35760 6.35760 6.35760 6.35760 Alpha virt. eigenvalues -- 7.84835 7.84835 7.84835 8.33659
Thus Gaussian agrees with both sets of orbital energies.
— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/jjgoings/McMurchie-Davidson/issues/2#issuecomment-314283569, or mute the threadhttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ALa952qN9aj2TL7m2zJMZ8np2iN-MlKCks5sMrt4gaJpZM4OTjXm.
I have run a calculation of the orbital energies of He by running:
This gives: (-0.91763022293+0j) (0.590153664669+0j) (1.50050938826+0j) (1.50050938826+0j) (1.50050938826+0j) (3.44176528807+0j) (6.35759720056+0j) (6.35759720056+0j) (6.35759720056+0j) (6.35759720056+0j) (6.35759720056+0j) (7.84834677038+0j) (7.84834677038+0j) (7.84834677038+0j) (8.33659446818+0j)
When the same calculation is performed with the Dalton program the following energies are found:
Symmetry 1A . Hartree-Fock orbital energies: -0.91762549 0.63664267 1.50051327 1.50051327 1.50051327 4.60856244 6.35760376 6.35760376 6.35760376 6.35760376 6.35760376 7.84835826 7.84835826 7.84835826
It can be seen that the second orbital energy is quite different (0.590153664669 and 0.63664267). I have only been able to observe differences larger than the SCF convergence when D orbitals are included in the basisset. The orbital energies might be correct when only S and P orbitals are included, maybe. I have no idea right now what the problem is. Here is data.py with cc-pVTZ for He included (rename it from .pdf to .py, github cannot attach .py in issues). data.pdf