Closed scolecophagous closed 3 years ago
wow, thanks, that was the problem, itñs fixed in last commit. About dhronx, thanks too, althought here i think none of us have the complete solution, I've added sympy solution as comment in code and I´m working in equilibrium routine to use the values and check result Thanks for feedback
Your project looks great! Good luck.
Thanks for the reply.
On Thu, 3 Jun 2021 at 03:45, Juan José Gómez Romera < @.***> wrote:
wow, thanks, thats was the problem, fix in last commit. About dhronx, thanks too, anyway here i think none of us have complete solution, added sympy solution as comment in code and working in equilibrium routine to use the values and check result
— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/jjgomera/iapws/issues/54#issuecomment-853739095, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AUHTUDDZBVD2WHA4SI2BN5TTQ5FLVANCNFSM45TF7DMA .
Thanks for your great work on the IAPWS for python.
I think that the FIXME in the H2ONH3() _prop() _phir() routine is related to using mass density where molar density should be used. The original source uses mole fraction and mole density. The critical densities of water and ammonia need to be converted molar densities and then used to calculate rhoc12 and rhon.
There also seems to be a couple of sign errors (+/-) in the drhonx formula
The pressures still don't match exactly. I haven't completely checked this either though.
Density reducing value, Eq 5