Closed xieyunzi closed 8 years ago
hello @jjh42
Hi. Sorry I missed this. I've added a couple of comments. Also, could you add something to the README.
Thanks,
Hi @jjh42 , it's been updated.
Thanks @xieyunzi for updating the README. The other suggestion I had was to refactor with_mock
to simply call with_mocks
. Right now there is a lot of redundancy between those two macros.
not remove since we need backwards compatibility, refactor be implemented by calling with_mocks.
J
On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 11:39 AM, Reiner notifications@github.com wrote:
You mean remove with_mock ?
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/jjh42/mock/pull/48#issuecomment-229320936, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe/AAWpXrIsO8lL5sglrPo7QEOkfoyX9yjkks5qQkt3gaJpZM4I6t7W .
Haha 😅 misunderstand, updated now
Thanks. Great contribution. I'll try and do a new release soon.
Any update on the new release?
+1 Would also like to be able to use with_mocks
Bueller?
@jjh42 could you please tag a new release?
Hi. Sorry I've been swamped, will try and get to this shortly.
This has been published to hex now. Hopefully that resolves your problems. Please let me know how you get on.
https://github.com/jjh42/mock/issues/44