Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 8 years ago
[deleted comment]
hi,
why using Groovy for DSL ? What is the support it provides in this sense ?
thanks,
valerio
Original comment by valerio....@gmail.com
on 4 Jun 2007 at 11:48
Hi Valerio,
AFAIK, with Groovy we can create an API (or DSL, Domain Specific Language) that
is
much shorter, cleaner and easier to read and write. I don't have any experience
with
Groovy at all, but I've been reading about creating DSLs with Groovy and it
looks
pretty useful.
The plan is to experiment with Groovy to see if we can accomplish this goal. My
good
friend Andres Almiray (who has experience with Groovy) offered his help
regarding
this topic. You can find his blog at http://jroller.com/page/aalmiray
Best regards,
-Alex.
Original comment by Alex.Rui...@gmail.com
on 4 Jun 2007 at 11:55
I'd be glad to help too if you have anything you want me to look at.
Cheers, Paul.
Original comment by robl...@gmail.com
on 8 Jun 2007 at 4:10
I'd be glad to help too if you have anything you want me to look at.
Cheers, Paul.
Original comment by Paul.Kin...@gmail.com
on 8 Jun 2007 at 4:17
Started work last night for Groovy-based DSL
Original comment by Alex.Rui...@gmail.com
on 23 Jun 2007 at 5:44
[deleted comment]
I included some FEST/Groovy examples in my Agile 2007 Open Source Testing Tools
talk
yesterday. It was all using Groovy, it went like:
(1) Create a web service
(2) Test web service using Groovy
(3) Create SwingBuilder GUI for web service
(4) Test using FEST
(5) Create Web form Groovlet for web service
(6) Test using Groovyized Canoo WebTest
Original comment by Paul.Kin...@gmail.com
on 16 Aug 2007 at 5:42
Thanks guys for offering help. I truly appreciate it :)
I'm sorry for the late reply (I hope you can see this message). Google Code
never
notified me about new comments on this issue :(
-Alex.
Original comment by Alex.Rui...@gmail.com
on 17 Aug 2007 at 2:05
Thanks Paul for including FEST at your session at Agile 2007. That is totally
awesome! What a great honor for us! Totally cool!! :)
-Alex.
Original comment by Alex.Rui...@gmail.com
on 17 Aug 2007 at 2:10
Any thoughts about the FEST + Groovy + Easyb article?
http://www.jroller.com/aalmiray/entry/fest_easyb_making_ui_testing
Do you think this is the direction forming a DSL for FEST-Swing might head?
Original comment by simeon.f...@gmail.com
on 28 Jun 2008 at 5:16
I really, really like what Andres has done with easyb and FEST. I think that by
combining these two tools, Andres has significantly reduced the amount of work
from
our part. I've been discussing with Andres several approaches for the FEST
Groovy DSL
and we will start a prototype pretty soon. At the same time I will be posting
our
progress in the mailing list as soon as we start and, as always, feedback is
welcome!! :)
Original comment by Alex.Rui...@gmail.com
on 2 Jul 2008 at 11:26
I really like the result too. My initial reaction would be to recommend that we
encourage easyb to be the best bdd framework that it can be and FEST to be the
best
GUI testing framework that it can be. Then using the two together should
hopefully be
easy and powerful. Of course, that doesn't always work in practice.
Original comment by Paul.Kin...@gmail.com
on 3 Jul 2008 at 10:38
[deleted comment]
Set the module as a label, instead of being part of the title.
Original comment by Alex.Rui...@gmail.com
on 30 Nov 2008 at 11:54
[deleted comment]
did my comments get submitted?
Original comment by Michel.L...@gmail.com
on 2 Dec 2008 at 9:22
I just posted a rather large comment with my DSL experience in my current
project,
but I don't see it. Is this under review or something?
Original comment by Michel.L...@gmail.com
on 2 Dec 2008 at 9:24
Hi Michel,
I don't know why your comment didn't appear. It is not under review or anything
like
that. It should have shown (probably a bug in Google Code?)
Please feel free to send me an e-mail to alex.ruiz.05 at gmail.com with your
comment.
I'll re-post it.
Thanks,
-Alex
Original comment by Alex.Rui...@gmail.com
on 2 Dec 2008 at 1:22
Hi Michel,
I saw your comment about a (very nice) Groovy DSL on issue 221. Is that the
comment
you were referring to?
-Alex
Original comment by Alex.Rui...@gmail.com
on 2 Dec 2008 at 1:24
I actually need to create a new module in the issue tracker for this issue. We
have
decided that the Groovy DSL will be a separate module, with its own release
cycle. We
prefer to have this module to depend more on the releases of Groovy itself
rather
than FEST. For now, I'll assign it to release 1.1.
Original comment by Alex.Rui...@gmail.com
on 4 Dec 2008 at 6:01
Original comment by Alex.Rui...@gmail.com
on 5 Feb 2009 at 5:10
Original comment by Alex.Rui...@gmail.com
on 5 Feb 2009 at 7:12
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
Alex.Rui...@gmail.com
on 16 May 2007 at 12:52