Closed siraben closed 3 years ago
Hi! Does it work better with latest ACME sources from Sourceforge?
On Mon, 7 Jun 2021 at 13:35, Ben Siraphob @.***> wrote:
I am creating this issue on behalf of another person who does not have a GitHub account.
Trying to compile durexforth from https://github.com/jkotlinski/durexforth.git, commit 5c80c6e https://github.com/jkotlinski/durexforth/commit/5c80c6e09639ccd76f3eb86ec0c19f0123a29cd8 .
Cloned ACME from https://github.com/meonwax/acme.git, commit 99fae48.
Successfully compiled ACME using gcc (GCC) 10.3.0, but with some warnings:
@.** ~/Repos/acme/src [env]$ make userinstall gcc -O3 -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -c -o acme.o acme.c gcc -O3 -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -c -o alu.o alu.c gcc -O3 -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -c -o cliargs.o cliargs.c gcc -O3 -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -c -o cpu.o cpu.c gcc -O3 -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -c -o dynabuf.o dynabuf.c gcc -O3 -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -c -o encoding.o encoding.c gcc -O3 -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -c -o flow.o flow.c gcc -O3 -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -c -o global.o global.c gcc -O3 -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -c -o input.o input.c input.c: In function ‘report_srcchar’: input.c:92:35: warning: ‘sprintf’ writing a terminating nul past the end of the destination [-Wformat-overflow=] 92 | sprintf(hexdump + 2 ii, "%02x", (unsigned int) (unsigned char) (report->bin_buf[ii])); | ^ input.c:92:4: note: ‘sprintf’ output 3 bytes into a destination of size 2 92 | sprintf(hexdump + 2 * ii, "%02x", (unsigned int) (unsigned char) (report->bin_buf[ii])); | ^
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ gcc -O3 -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -c -o macro.o macro.c gcc -O3 -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -c -o mnemo.o mnemo.c mnemo.c: In function ‘check_mnemo_tree’: mnemo.c:1041:10: warning: cast from pointer to integer of different size [-Wpointer-to-int-cast] 1041 | code = ((int) node_body) & CODEMASK; // get opcode or table index | ^ mnemo.c:1042:20: warning: cast from pointer to integer of different size [-Wpointer-to-int-cast] 1042 | immediate_mode = ((int) node_body) & IMMASK; // get immediate mode | ^ gcc -O3 -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -c -o output.o output.c gcc -O3 -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -c -o platform.o platform.c gcc -O3 -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -c -o pseudoopcodes.o pseudoopcodes.c gcc -O3 -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -c -o section.o section.c gcc -O3 -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -c -o symbol.o symbol.c gcc -O3 -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -c -o tree.o tree.c gcc -O3 -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -c -o typesystem.o typesystem.c gcc -O3 -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -o acme acme.o alu.o cliargs.o cpu.o dynabuf.o encoding.o flow.o global.o input.o macro.o mnemo.o output.o platform.o pseudoopcodes.o section.o symbol.o tree.o typesystem.o -lm strip acme install -d /home/christopher/local/bin install acme /home/christopher/local/binAttempt to assemble durexforth fails with some errors:
@. ~/Repos/durexforth [env]$ make Error - File durexforth.asm, line 126 (Zone
): There's more than one character. Error - File durexforth.asm, line 126 (Zone [Makefile:51: durexforth.prg] Error 1): No value given. Error - File durexforth.asm, line 126 (Zone ): Macro not defined (or wrong signature). Error - File durexforth.asm, line 109 (Macro BACKLINK): Unknown function. Error - File durexforth.asm, line 109 (Macro BACKLINK): No value given. Serious error - File durexforth.asm, line 111 (Macro BACKLINK): Value not defined (__LATEST). make: My system information:
@.***
OS: Guix System 7382aa00b82860762bc326dec6b45f8cd2161327 x86_64
Host: GA-880GM-UD2H
Kernel: 5.12.9-gnu
Uptime: 2 days, 11 hours, 13 mins
Packages: 106 (guix-system), 98 (guix-user)
Shell: bash 5.0.16
Resolution: 1920x1200
DE: GNOME 3.34.5
Theme: Adwaita [GTK2/3]
Icons: Adwaita [GTK2/3]
Terminal: kitty
CPU: AMD Athlon II X3 455 (3) @ 3.300GHz
GPU: NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3
Memory: 2828MiB / 7957MiB
My contact information: christopher -AT- librehacker -DOT- com
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/jkotlinski/durexforth/issues/352, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAY34O3ILVZKKQCZTIW5C33TRSVHFANCNFSM46HO7ZKQ .
Replying on behalf of Christopher:
Yes, the sources from SourceForge worked better, and I was able to successfully compile the durexforth .d64 image and run it in VICE.
For the record, I cloned with svn checkout https://svn.code.sf.net/p/acme-crossass/code-0/trunk acme-crossass-code-0
and used revision 319.
Thank you!
Christopher
I am creating this issue on behalf of another person who does not have a GitHub account.
Trying to compile durexforth from https://github.com/jkotlinski/durexforth.git, commit 5c80c6e.
Cloned ACME from https://github.com/meonwax/acme.git, commit 99fae48.
Successfully compiled ACME using gcc (GCC) 10.3.0, but with some warnings:
Attempt to assemble durexforth fails with some errors:
My system information:
My contact information: christopher -AT- librehacker -DOT- com