Closed guybedford closed 5 years ago
+1, also nice from a symmetry perspective (even though it's slightly more verbose).
I was thinking the exact same thing because “./“ without a path is “/“ whereas “.” could be the root entry “.” should that ever be intended or even be conceivable.
This was in the context of avoiding “” if I am not mistaken, right?
This happened!
An alternative here could be to use
./
over/
:This might avoid confusion with
/
meaning the root in the map.