search

jl168 / open-hardware-monitor

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/open-hardware-monitor
0 stars 0 forks source link

Values for Min and Max "Available Memory" are swapped #442

Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
What is the expected output?  What do you see instead?
I expect:
  +- 029E CMZ32GX3M4X1600C10 (/ram)
  |  +- Memory           :  10.5027   9.2738  27.4694 (/ram/load/0)
  |  +- Used Memory      :  3.35523  2.96265   8.7755 (/ram/data/0)
>>|  +- Available Memory :  28.5912  28.9838  23.1709 (/ram/data/1)

I see instead:
  +- 029E CMZ32GX3M4X1600C10 (/ram)
  |  +- Memory           :  10.5027   9.2738  27.4694 (/ram/load/0)
  |  +- Used Memory      :  3.35523  2.96265   8.7755 (/ram/data/0)
>>|  +- Available Memory :  28.5912  23.1709  28.9838 (/ram/data/1)

What version of the product are you using? On what operating system?
 Version 0.5.1 Beta
 Windows 7 x64 SP1; system has 32GB ram

Please provide any additional information below.
 Pretty much sums it up; the "used min" and "available max" add up
 to 32GB, as does "used max" and "available min".  The current
 value's used and available properly add up to ~32GB.

Please attach a Report created with "File / Save Report...".

Thanks!

Original issue reported on code.google.com by johnharn...@gmail.com on 15 Feb 2013 at 6:30

Attachments:

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
Oh; I just now realized this is open to some ambiguity!

I was interpreting it as "WHEN the Min Used is this, THIS is its Available."

Clearly, this is a min/max table, and the two lines for Used and Available
are not related.  Of COURSE the "max used" and the "min (ever) available"
add up.

My bad.  I'll close the report now.  Thanks for your time.
\john

Original comment by johnharn...@gmail.com on 15 Feb 2013 at 6:34

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
Obviously I can't close this myself.  Please do so at your earliest 
convenience, and again, my apologies for just "getting it".

Best,
\john

Original comment by johnharn...@gmail.com on 15 Feb 2013 at 6:36

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Original comment by moel.mich on 15 Feb 2013 at 10:01