jlabbe-processia / mxupdate

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/mxupdate
1 stars 1 forks source link

branch changes in signatures of policies are not updated #155

Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. create policy with attached file POLICY_test.tcl
2. check in Business Client the signature "No" on state "Main Material 
Received" - it is o.k. pointing to "Main Material Received"
3. change line 85 of the file to 'branch "Initiated (PO Position Exists)"'
4. update again
5. check in Business Client the signature "No" again. It still points to "Main 
Material Received" but should point to "Initiated (PO Position Exists)", also 
no error/warning is shown during update that something went wrong.

What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
- expected is a correct updated signature

What version of the product are you using? On what operating system?
- 0.10.0 on Windows XP

Please provide any additional information below.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by Jens.Sch...@de.soliver.com on 19 Aug 2011 at 10:15

Attachments:

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
I'm sorry, I could not reproduce it, wether in version V0.10.0 nor in the 
future V0.11.0...

What version of MX do you use? For my tests I've used V6R2011x....

Thanks

Original comment by t...@moxter.net on 15 Sep 2011 at 8:59

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
We are on V6R2011. But today I tried the same thing because I want to make 
screenshots for you and I'm also not able to reproduce it. Maybe there was 
something wrong with my input file, I don't know. Sorry for that! So I think we 
can close this and I will open a new one if I'm able to reproduce it ...

Original comment by Jens.Sch...@de.soliver.com on 16 Sep 2011 at 7:43

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
Thanks for your information. The issue is now closed.

Original comment by t...@moxter.net on 5 Nov 2011 at 4:51

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago

Original comment by tim.mox...@innobix.com on 7 Feb 2014 at 8:30