Closed Davknapp closed 1 year ago
@Davknapp it looks like this has some conflicts, and seems to duplicate some of the changes made in #81 too. Is there any way to fix this? For example, could you branch off of main
now that #81 is merged and cherry pick the new commits from this PR?
@Davknapp it looks like this has some conflicts, and seems to duplicate some of the changes made in #81 too. Is there any way to fix this? For example, could you branch off of
main
now that #81 is merged and cherry pick the new commits from this PR?
I merged the current main-branch into this branch. The branch is directly build on #81 therefore it should solve the issue.
Merging #83 (9257f0a) into main (a6e8684) will decrease coverage by
0.70%
. The diff coverage is94.00%
.:exclamation: Current head 9257f0a differs from pull request most recent head 086352f. Consider uploading reports for the commit 086352f to get more accurate results
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #83 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 97.26% 96.56% -0.70%
==========================================
Files 19 22 +3
Lines 2193 2417 +224
==========================================
+ Hits 2133 2334 +201
- Misses 60 83 +23
Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
src/RefElemData.jl | 93.68% <ø> (ø) |
|
src/RefElemData_polynomial.jl | 100.00% <ø> (ø) |
|
src/mesh/simple_meshes.jl | 97.62% <0.00%> (ø) |
|
src/mesh/triangulate_example_meshes.jl | 100.00% <ø> (ø) |
|
src/state_redistribution.jl | 95.71% <72.72%> (+0.67%) |
:arrow_up: |
src/hybrid_meshes.jl | 95.12% <87.09%> (-3.11%) |
:arrow_down: |
src/mesh/mesh_visualization.jl | 93.22% <90.47%> (-1.52%) |
:arrow_down: |
src/cut_cell_meshes.jl | 97.51% <91.54%> (-1.26%) |
:arrow_down: |
src/MeshData.jl | 93.54% <92.30%> (-0.99%) |
:arrow_down: |
src/named_array_partition.jl | 94.44% <94.44%> (ø) |
|
... and 12 more |
:mega: We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more
Add Quads to the vtk-writer. Similar to the triangle-vtk-writer.