Open jasonm23 opened 9 years ago
I am biased toward vim, but regardless I think there's a mixed message to say that someone should learn enacts though it won't always be installed.
Most of the time it will, and it is straight forward to do apt-get / yum / port / etc.
People are going to be installing the web server / language etc that they want to use, so don't be so obviously and obnoxiously biased.
vi is the ideal choice due to its availability on most installations, you can't argue against that. The statement about no competition or hipster editors would be better left out.
As biased as it may be, it certainly lends entertainment value to what could otherwise become a very dry topic.
I think the real value of this entry is in the first sentence: "Learn at least one text-based editor well"
Since we shouldn't let this turn into a religious war (which is easy for the Vi/Emacs discussion) - shouldn't we leave it at this first sentence? We can list some examples, like "for example Vi(m), Emacs, Nano or Ed" - well maybe we should skip the last one...
The only other option would be to list every single text-based editor, but then someone is going to complain about the order in which they are listed.
Seems like the most useful solution to me.
I think including Ed would be cute.
I've created #129 based on this... Feel free to review/comment.
Specifically...
This simply isn't true, it should be redacted.
I suggest something a little more balanced.