Open Rudxain opened 2 years ago
Fair point. Will leave this open for a future update.
standard specification aiming at portability and compatibility
It fails on both regarding PATH, program lookup and is missing extensibility + external control/librarification. Software/Standards not defined for extensibility + external control/librarification
becomes bloated or under-specified over time.
If you still want to mention it, I would recommend to embed the context and shortcomings. The most severe ones are that bash has no reliable way to copy cli content (only works for me with v to open in $EDITOR which also always runs command). No idea, if it works in emacs mode.
It fails on both regarding PATH, program lookup and is missing extensibility + external control/librarification.
True, specially the lack of extensibility.
If you still want to mention it, I would recommend to embed the context and shortcomings.
I totally agree
No abre la dirección
El mar., 31 de enero de 2023 12:24 a. m., Ricardo Fernández Serrata < @.***> escribió:
It fails on both regarding PATH, program lookup and is missing extensibility + external control/librarification.
True, specially the lack of extensibility.
If you still want to mention it, I would recommend to embed the context and shortcomings.
I totally agree
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/jlevy/the-art-of-command-line/issues/769#issuecomment-1409885101, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/A5HTMYW74C7WNV77U7CWV2DWVC44BANCNFSM5UJK5ZCA . You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: @.***>
@Aurenas
No abre la dirección
¿cuál dirección?
Since this has a big focus on Linux shells, POSIX is something that should be talked about, because it's a standard specification aiming at portability and compatibility.
Perhaps POSIX has already been mentioned, but I couldn't find it. Please let me know if I'm wrong