Closed dinyar closed 9 years ago
Is position of XTRK
important? I.e. before / after muons (before / after energies)?
No, i only use the "internal ordering", so muons should be ordered from fwd+ to fwd- and tracks as well, but they could be interlaced.
On Wed, Nov 5, 2014, 13:19 Joschka Lingemann notifications@github.com wrote:
Is position of XTRK important? I.e. before / after muons (before / after energies)?
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/jlingema/uGMTScripts/issues/9#issuecomment-61799036.
A first version of this has been added to the repo: https://github.com/jlingema/uGMTScripts/tree/master/ugmt_patterns/data/patterns/testbench
Please check and let me know if something should be changed.
This is working well with the first version of the testbench. Would it be possible though to remove the two newlines at the end of the pattern files?
The new version does not have newlines anymore.
Great, seems to work now! Closing.
fyi: I just checked - at least one newline doesn't seem to crash the testbench.
Hi Joschka,
here a preliminary wishlist for the testbench pattern file. The current format (found in https://github.com/jlingema/uGMTScripts/tree/master/ugmt_patterns/data/patterns/emu) is more or less what the testbench accepts now, but the following additions/changes would be great:
XTRK eta1 phi1 qual1 eta2 phi2 qual2 eta3 phi3 qual3
whereXTRK
can beBTRK
,OTRK+
,FTRK+
,OTRK-
, andFTRK-
.Let me know if something can't be changed easily, it may be a fast fix in the testbench..