Closed timoxley closed 9 years ago
.js might add some context relative to its clojure roots, but that context not particularly important to a consumer of your library.
I'm open to it, but the word "transducer" in general is getting confusing regarding npm packages. There's transducer (which the author said he plans on taking down), transducer.js, and now transducer-js (cognitect's project). I'm considering renaming the project in general to get away from that confusion, but I'd like it give it some time to see what feels right.
Cool, sounds good.
I also would prefer to have transducers
package over transducers.js
. BTW I have also removed transducers package from npm ;)
Unfortunately gozala took over that name :p so I dunno. it is a little confusing. I guess I should have moved earlier.
oh well, I guess can't be resolved. No problem, was only really a suggestion because the non-.js version was still available.
lest somebody takes the
transducers
name. The .js is kinda redundant in the context of web and npm. Superficial? yeah.