Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 8 years ago
It certainly has been a while since we added that check; I'll have to go in and
look. Does the file with the empty value import correctly when you import it
via File > Import > Preferences?
Original comment by konigsb...@gmail.com
on 16 Aug 2012 at 12:14
File > Import > Preferences says the file has not content :(
But File > Export > Preferences does not support much things ...
Original comment by benoit.g...@gmail.com
on 16 Aug 2012 at 5:27
Sadly, if Eclipse can't import it, we probably can't either. I realize that
makes it challenging to, say, remove a preference. Do you have any alternate
suggestions?
Original comment by konigsb...@gmail.com
on 16 Aug 2012 at 5:52
I will recheck with a preference file supported by the import/export wizard of
eclipse
but just commenting out the NullCheck makes WorkspaceMechanic works as expected
:)
Original comment by benoit.g...@gmail.com
on 16 Aug 2012 at 6:25
We want to use WorkspaceMechanic in our team to synchornize workspace settings
(task type RECONCILE), but we run into here mentioned problem. Our use case is:
1. Setup one environment (workspace) manually
2. Export settings using WorkspaceMechanic / Preference Recorder
3. Share exported settings
4. In each workspace in team configure WorkspaceMechanic to shared setting
Problem is that WorkspaceMechanic himself has exported Java Code Style property
/instance/org.eclipse.jdt.core/org.eclipse.jdt.core.codeComplete.staticFieldPref
ixes=
without value (as was configured), but this setting can not be imported more.
When I define standalone epf file with one line containing
org.eclipse.jdt.core/org.eclipse.jdt.core.codeComplete.staticFieldPrefixes=
and import this file with Eclipse Import>Preferences, it work fine and removes
previously set prefix value.
From comments above, can I not exactly understand what is the attitude of
implementation team to this problem. Will it be corrected and when? Or is it no
bug?
Original comment by rastisla...@gmail.com
on 3 Oct 2012 at 8:35
As to whether or not it's a bug requires more investigation. However, as I
recently mentioned on the mailing list [1] I'm not going to be doing much work,
if any, on Workspace Mechanic. I will, however, consider accepting _complete_
patches, including very thorough tests. Many people still rely on the Workspace
Mechanic, particularly around the area of preferences, and fixes that cause
regressions makes for unhappy users.
[1]
https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups=#!topic/workspacemechanic/oJop9jmLZH
0
Original comment by konigsb...@gmail.com
on 3 Oct 2012 at 12:20
Removebin
Original comment by williamng499@gmail.com
on 17 May 2015 at 6:08
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
benoit.g...@gmail.com
on 16 Aug 2012 at 7:32