search

jmespath / jmespath.jep

Proposals for extending the JMESPath Language.
8 stars 5 forks source link

Proposal for JEP deprecations #19

Closed springcomp closed 1 year ago

springcomp commented 1 year ago

This PR proposes a numbering scheme for deprecation of existing JEPs.

jamesls commented 1 year ago

For context, the JEP process was modeled after how other languages/standards propose changes. Most of these processes just use a single integer. The numbers in the JEPs don't really mean anything, they're just an identifier to refer to a feature. I'm not even picky if we skip numbers (I'll probably just end up using the PR numbers).

The RFC process has an Obsoletes metadata field you can add, and I wouldn't be opposed to adding that. We could also borrow some of the metadata from the PEP process which has a number of relevant fields Replaces, Superseded-by, etc.

For now, if you'd like to update the PR with the typo updates, I'd be happy to merge those.